Another no-holds barred discussion forum, where you prove that you're the most deadly Atonement ninja in the class.
Atonement is, at core, a novel about trying to fix something that’s irretrievably broken. By the time you finish the book, you realize that the whole story is, if not an outright lie, then a very heavily edited piece of Historical Metafiction, in which Briony tries desperately to re-write her life, and those of the people she’s hurt so terribly.

Your blogging mission is to consider the whole novel, but especially the last two sections (“Part Three” and “London 1999") and prove that, ultimately, Briony isn’t a despicable person. In the words of my learned colleague Cox: “Find something about her to like.” And then prove it.

As with the Hamlet blog, make your stand on the issue in an argument of about 500 words, cite textual references, and then make a detailed comment on at least one classmate’s posting, agreeing, disagreeing, or taking the discussion in a different direction. Making references to life, movies, other things you’ve read, etc. are fair game, as long as they’re relevant. (Again, comment right in your blog entry, don't worry about using the comment links beneath your classmates' entries.)

Finally, be sure to clearly place your NAME in the title of your Posting!

Wednesday 14 May 2014

Briony: More the Golem than Mordor by Casandra Barrett

Briony was not the evil monster a lot of us think she is. She was an ignorant, misguided girl that let her

cowardice hold her back from doing what was right. Was she a great person? No. She was a control freak,

she twisted and turned Robbie and Cecilia's fate in reality and in her story. However, her story is more of a

sad story than anything else. She knew Robbie and Cecilia wouldn't forgive her, and she couldn't even

forgive herself. She lived alone and died alone, and I can't hate her because I pity her so much more then I

dislike her for being a coward.

Proof:

            1) Briony wasn't an evil mastermind pulling the strings behind an elaborate revenge plan:

She was precocious and sexually uneducated, "... no one, not even her mother, had ever referred to the

existence of that part of her to which -- Briony was certain -- the word referred" (107) and she had literally

just become self-aware, "Was everyone else really as alive as she was?" (34). This idea of revenge was her

own portrayal of what Robbie might have thought of her, and not necessarily and definitely not absolutely

the truth, because it was Briony herself that wrote Robbie considering that her acts were for vengeance, we

know this because "Robbie Turner died of septicemia at Bray Dunes on 1 June 1940." (350). He couldn't

verifiably have thought these things if Briony was simply recreating his thoughts from her own imagination.

That she had acted maliciously as a child is unfounded because she genuinely didn't understand what she

was doing, just like she didn't understand the danger she put Robbie in by pretending to drown that day,

"'You went under the surface, I couldn't see you. My clothes were weighing me down. We could have

drowned, both of us.'" (218), but Briony did come to realize her mistake in blaming Robbie, "She was like a

bride-to-be who begins to feel her sickening qualms as the day approaches, and dares not speak her mind

because so many preparations have been made on her behalf." (150) Briony simply didn't have the have the

courage to go back on her word! " She did not think she had the courage, after all her initial certainty and

two or three days of patient, kindly interviewing, to withdraw her evidence." (159) Two or three days! It

took her a few days to realize that something was wrong, but she didn't want to be 'a silly girl who had

wasted everyone's time' (160). Instead, she deliberately carried through despite her doubts, knowing she

was 'never pressured or bullied' (160). Rather than be courageous, " She trapped herself, she marched into

the labyrinth of her own construction, and was too young, too awestruck, too keen to please, to insist on

making her own way back." (160).

So we know that she was just an ignorant young girl too afraid to go back on what she thought was the

truth, at the time. Briony didn't know anything about healthy sexuality, or sexuality at all. If she didn't

understand initially the effect of her accusations, and then grew to realize, how could it have possibly been a

malicious act from the start?

             2) While I love and dread equally thinking about existentialism, particularly the writing of Albert Camus,

existential thought doesn't really apply to Briony's accusation or her view if the world - because she never

lets go, which is what existentialism is all about:

She was a victorian girl through and through, prim, proper and ignorant to even the notion of sexuality. She's

naive about marriage: "Marriage was the thing, or rather, a wedding was, with its formal neatness of virtue

rewarded, the thrill of its pageantry and banqueting, and dizzy promise of lifelong uinion." (8). She wants to

control her family into what she views as right, for example Leon, "Her play was not for her cousins, it was

for her brother, to celebrate his return, to provoke his admiration and guide him away from his careless

succession of girlfriends, toward the right form of wife, the one who would persuade him to return to the

countryside" (4) She's truly a child in every sense of the word, desperate for the perfect ending she deems

fit. "She was one of those children possessed by a desire to have the world just so." (4). While I know

Roman specifically said that he grew fond of her near the end, this childish need for 'the promise of lifelong

union' never really leaves Briony's thoughts. In the end, she still made Robbie and Cecilia, "..still alive, still in

love, sitting side by side in the library" (350). She admits this to us in the end, saying, "The problem these

fifty-nine years has been this: how can a novelist achieve atonement when, with her absolute power of

deciding outcomes, she is also God?" (350). If Briony could have had it her own way she would have

chosen that ending as reality, the one in which Robbie and Cecilia were still alive to love. This isn't the truth,

and only she can make it true within her own mind and the mind's of others to atone for the fact that Robbie

and Cecilia "never met again, never fulfilled their love?" (350). Just like when she was a child, too afraid to

admit that she was the 'bride with cold feet'(150), she became "too old, too frightened, too much in love

with the shred of life I have remaining" (350). She asks us directly, "How could that constitute an ending?"

(350). She goes on to rationalize this "I like to think that it isn't weakness or evasion, but a final act of

kindness, a stand against oblivion and despair," (351) but I think it's more kindness to herself than to Robbie

and Cee who have already lived their horrible fate, with Robbie having died at war and Cecilia by a bomb

within the same year (350).

Going back to existentialism, Briony couldn't have been an existentialist, because like stated in Albert

Camus' The Stranger or L'Etranger, "It was as if that great rush of anger had washed me clean, emptied me

of hope, and, gazing up at the dark sky spangled with its signs and stars, for the first time, the first, I laid my

heart open to the benign indifference of the universe. To feel it so like myself, indeed, so brotherly, made me

realize that I'd been happy, and that I was happy still." I don't have a page but it was basically the second

last page, and was about him accepting his death by execution.  Existentialists accept.Existentialists look into

the dark void of the universe and accept it. Briony "took a stand against oblivion and despair," (350). She

never let go, she never forgave herself, and yet controlled her universe as "God" (350) until the very end.

                3) With her impending dementia, "The process will be slow, but my brain, my mind, is closing down. The

little failures of the memory that dog us all beyond a certain point will become more noticeable, more

debilitating, until the time will come when I won't notice them because I will have lost the ability to

comprehend anything at all" (334), all Briony can do now is look back at her life. Like I asserted in my first

points, Briony is a coward, and in my second,  Briony's need for control is what never allows her to let go. I

can't really dislike her in the end, because her life was more sad than anything else - a sad confused girl

grown into a sad lonely old woman, who's only liberation is that she will be able to forget her crimes.

So, was Briony admirable in any way? Maybe in that she deluded herself until the very end. Or that she

learned and lived the rest of her life trying to make up for her cowardice, but the reality is that she never did,

and never could. The day she felt the wrongness in the pit of her stomach and held her tongue was the day

she became irredeemable. When you know something, deep within and make the choice that you know is

the wrong one, it's too late. Does she deserve forgiveness? No. Pity? Probably. She definitely deserved to

be able to let go, but what damned her -- her stubborn cowardice -- is what never allowed her to set herself

free. I think that's profoundly sad.

The real blame here should be set on the adults in Briony's life that so neglected and yet coddled her.

Encouraging her writing but not teaching her right from wrong. Briony wasn't the only one at fault, the

parents in her life abandoned her almost of much as they abandoned Robbie by not defending him and by

not being there for her, which is why I blame them for what happened more than I blame Briony - a

forgotten child. I truly pity her.

No comments:

Post a Comment