Please
Like Me I’m Not That Bad
Briony oh Briony, where do we start
trying to make people like you? A forewarning for this, my reasoning for why
one should like Briony might come off as glorifying sociopathic
characteristics, but now because we’re studying Post-Modernism it isn’t taboo
to do as such. To begin with Briony is honestly a likeable character just as
Shakespeare was, no matter how confusing both of their writings are (Atonement
and Shakespeare’s plays) these two individuals are far beyond their times with
Briony displaying the Post-Modern mindset of “a culture of victimization” as
Irving Horowitz refers to it as, and Shakespeare displaying the Human Condition
prior to it being coined and explored for years. Briony shows this “culture of
victimization” when she accuses and convicts Robbie for the rape of Lola by
saying “Did he believe he could conceal his crime behind an apparent
kindness, behind this show of being the good shepherd?” (McEwan 173) because
she feels victimized by Robbie as you later figure out in Part II as Robbie
tells Briony after her staged drowning “I’d risk my life for yours. But that
doesn’t mean I love you” (McEwan 248) showing the Post-Modern way of thinking
that because something doesn’t work out for yourself, you are a victim of
something or someone, in this case Briony is a victim of her older sister
causing her “lover” to not love her, therefore seeking revenge as activist
groups do now.
Another
reason for my fondness of Briony is her manipulative charisma which allows her
to contort people’s thoughts and actions for her personal gain, though this is
a very well documented sociopathic tendency, it is such a respectable
characteristic in my eyes because it leads to so much prosperity for yourself
which at the end of the day is the most important thing as all you truly have
in the world is yourself without sounding too depressing rather existentially
speaking. Going back to Lola’s rape, Briony shows how manipulative she truly
can be when speaking to Lola about who she had seen ““It was Robbie, wasn’t
it?” The maniac. She wanted to say the word. Lola said nothing and did not
move. Briony said it again, this time without the trace of a question. It was a
statement of fact. “It was Robbie.” Though she had not turned, or moved at all,
it was clear that something was changing in Lola, a warmth rising from her skin
and a sound of dry swallowing, a heaving convulsion of muscle in her throat
that was audible as a series of sinewy clicks. Briony said it again. Simply.
“Robbie.”” (McEwan 156). This shows how Briony can implant her thoughts and
ideas into other’s heads for her personal gain (revenge), though her actions
are despicable they are also respectable in the same way that people were
stunned and horrified by the cult leader Charlie Manson while all at the same
time media was falling in love with his sociopathic charisma.
My
final reason for liking Briony is the same reason I have a strange fondness of
Jean-Paul Sarte and Friedrich Nietzsche for being existential nihilists (though
Nietzsche despised being considered a nihilist, but some of his works can be interpreted
as such), I grew fond of Briony at the end of the novel as she comes to the
realization that the attempt for atonement is an impossible and worthless task,
“No atonement for God, or novelists, even if they are atheists. It was always
an impossible task…” (McEwan 350). Not exactly sure why I like Briony or
existentialism for this cynical view on the world, but it someone what stuck to
me after reading Nausea by Jean-Paul Sarte and Thus Spoke Zarathustra by
Friedrich Nietzsche, but the whole idea of knowing and accepting that nothing
has worth so there is no reason to waste your finite time on such peripheral matters
must be respected by one.
To
sum up the whole blog for those who couldn’t care for the jargon and junk in
the middle and just want the idea of the whole thing, Briony isn’t that bad because:
1. Post-Modern
thinking in a Victorian home and Modern time.
2. Really
charismatic and can make people do stuff for her.
3. Realizes
what is really worthwhile in life.
Being the first person
to post, I had to wait for everyone else to post to have someone to comment on
since I didn’t want to go and comment on my own work which is clearly the only
correct answer *looks towards live studio audience for applause and approval*.
So I’ll comment on Cassandra’s piece since it goes at Briony in the existential
form as I did to put it briefly. I come from a more Nietzschean existentialism
where everything is done for self-improvement rather than the Camus style.
Where Cassandra speaks about that Briony wasn’t a “mastermind” in the revenge
against Robbie, that doesn’t excuse the actions for what she had done or means
that she didn’t find some sort of sadistic pleasure from the terror she caused
in his life. For example, Ukrainians in Schutzstaffel division on the Eastern front
during the Second World War that may have had involvement with the execution of
Ukrainian and Russian Jews, but just because they were not the masterminds of
the Final Solution to the Jewish Question it doesn’t mean they shouldn’t have
been blamed for what they had done to the Jewish people, also noting the
extreme anti-Semitism within Ukraine in those days where such actions were
justified per say. This comment is just becoming senseless rambling which the
social sciences and arts just love, I’ll make my second and final point short
and quaint. Speaking of how Briony isn’t an existentialist, she is a nihilist
in a sense because she realizes at the end in 1999 that all her means to make
atonement were worthless, therefore accepting the fact that her life has had no
purpose and any purpose was worthless.
I’d like to say that I
still enjoyed my post the most because why shouldn’t I? Post-modernism, am I
right guys/gals? *once again peers towards live studio audience*
Pretty me explaining
who’s post is my favourite
https://vine.co/v/hB10BrX1djb
No comments:
Post a Comment